Friday, February 29, 2008
Does Weight Lifting Make a Better Athlete? Maybe...
By GINA KOLATA
Published: February 28, 2008
The New York Times
MIKE PERRY, a 31-year-old rower, trained by himself in Ann Arbor, Mich., for six years while his wife attended medical school. Now he is a member of the United States rowing team and hopes to be selected in a couple of months to compete in the Summer Olympic Games.
These days, he works with a coach and a team, and for the first time he is also going to a gym twice a week and lifting free weights for his upper and lower body, and doing a lot of core exercises, he said. His coach insists upon it. Mr. Perry, though, said he cannot tell whether weight lifting is helping his performance.
His 29-year-old teammate, Mark Flickinger, thinks weight lifting has helped him. He said it is difficult to distinguish between the effects of training by rowing on the water and weight lifting at the gym.
But, he added, after three years of working with weights — including lifting to failure, the point at which he cannot do another repetition — he has become a better athlete. The training “improved my P.B.’s by a substantial margin,” he said, referring to personal bests, his best performances.
As it turns out, the question of whether weight training matters to serious endurance athletes is a matter of debate.
Researchers who study weight lifting, or resistance training as it often is called, are adamant. It definitely helps, they say. But other experts in the field are not so sure.
Gary R. Hunter, a professor of exercise physiology at the University of Alabama at Birmingham, is a believer. He cites, for example, a recent study involving middle-distance runners. Three months of resistance training, he said, improved their leg strength and running efficiency, a measure of how much effort it took to run.
And, he said, it is not just runners who become more efficient.
“There is no doubt that an appropriate weight-training program would improve efficiency in pretty much any athlete,” Dr. Hunter said.
William J. Kraemer, a kinesiology professor at the University of Connecticut in Storrs, said lifting weights also can increase endurance and reduce the risk of injury, especially to connective tissue.
And don’t worry about becoming too muscular, Dr. Kraemer said.
“The fear of getting really big is not plausible for most people,” he said. Competitive distance runners and cyclists, who are naturally slender and light, “don’t have the muscle fiber number to get really big,” Dr. Kraemer said. “I can train them until the cows come home and they are not going to have big muscles.”
But other researchers, like Patrick O’Connor, an exercise scientist at the University of Georgia, are not convinced.
Dr. O’Connor points out that the weight-lifting studies, as is typical in exercise science, are small. And each seems to examine a different regimen, to measure outcome differently and to study different subjects — trained athletes, sedentary people, recreational athletes. It becomes almost impossible to draw conclusions, he said.
That may be one reason why different athletes end up doing different weight-lifting exercises. Chris Martin, a 31-year-old chemical engineer who has an elite racing license from USA Triathlon, the governing body for the sport, works on his entire body. But for his legs, he does exercises like leg extensions using one leg at a time, to correct any muscle imbalances or weaknesses. Mr. Martin, who lives in Lawrenceville, N.J., said he got the idea from coaches and from his own reading.
“Cycling and running are one-leg-at-a-time activities,” he explained. And one-legged exercises “recruit more muscles that help the hips.”
Steve Spence, who won a bronze medal in the marathon at the 1991 track and field world championships in Tokyo, is also a proponent of one-legged exercises. Now 45 years old and the head cross-country coach at Shippensburg University in Pennsylvania, Mr. Spence enters local 5-kilometer races and typically finishes in about 15 minutes.
“I feel that every major breakthrough with my running has come after a period of strength training,” he said. He attributes this to the emphasis he puts on leg exercises, but he also believes that working his upper body and abdomen helped.
Other athletes concentrate on exercises that require them to jump or leap to develop explosive power.
And many top athletes spend lots of time in gyms lifting weights, and many trainers and coaches swear by it.
For example, the distance runners who are part of Team Running USA do resistance training for 30 to 60 minutes six days a week, said Terrence Mahon, a coach for the team. This group includes marathon stars Deena Kastor and Ryan Hall, the winner of the Olympic marathon trials last November.
“We do it all,” Mr. Mahon said. “We do upper body, core and lower body. The stronger the athlete is in a total body perspective, the more efficient they become as a runner.”
The Team USA runners do five to six exercises per session, he said. For example, upper body exercises may include pull-ups, the overhead press, bench press, rowing and exercises for the biceps and triceps. Lower body exercises include step-ups, squats, single leg squats, snatches and the leg press.
The main problem with weight lifting is that many people do it all wrong, said Kent Adams, the director of the exercise physiology laboratory at California State University at Monterey Bay. They don’t have a program or a goal. Technique may be sloppy. Or, Dr. Adams said, they use weights that are too light. Muscles need to be stressed if they are to respond, he said.
Dr. Kraemer is on the same page. One study, he said, found that women tend to lift half or less of what they could lift. And this happened even when women were working with personal trainers, he said.
“There is so much misinformation,” Dr. Kraemer said. “It’s a quagmire out there.” He recommends trainers certified by the National Strength and Conditioning Association, which also supplies educational information. Dr. Kraemer is a past president of the organization.
The right trainer, these researchers say, can be helpful when people are learning to lift weights. Not only can trainers teach proper technique, but they also can help people develop programs that meet their goals.
“I hate to say that a trainer is required for everybody,” Dr. Adams said. “But I think it is an excellent way to learn.”
That said, though, the evidence that weight lifting can improve performance is equivocal enough to leave plenty of room for the skeptics. And not every successful athlete spends serious time lifting weights.
DR. O’CONNOR, for example, lifts weights for health, for enjoyment and for vanity’s sake (he does not want an emaciated upper body, he said), but stops lifting when he is training to run a marathon. Those muscles, he said, “are just dead weight you have to carry around.” He adds that a sport like rowing, swimming or running requires specific muscles and nerve-firing patterns that may best be developed by actually doing the sport.
“If your goal is to improve running performance, then weight training should probably mimic the running pattern,” he said. “If you do leg extensions, you can get stronger, but people don’t run like that.”
That’s pretty much what Cathy O’Brien, a 40-year-old distance runner, thinks. She started racing when she was 12 and ran the marathon in the 1988 and 1992 Olympic Games.
“As far as resistance training, I have always been a minimalist,” she said. She does push-ups, pull-ups and dips for her upper body, and abdominal exercises, but does not work her legs.
“I think that running is the best thing for running results, ” Ms. O’Brien said.
Kevin Hanson, a coach for the Hansons-Brooks team of distance runners, is of like mind.
“We do some weight training,” he said. But other than some abdominal exercises, “everything we do is for the upper body.”
He has a ready answer for runners who ask about doing exercises for their legs.
“You let me know if you think we are not working your legs enough,” Mr. Hanson said. “There’s a lot more we can do to beat you up. But you don’t have to lift weights.”
Thursday, February 28, 2008
Is Your Dedication to Exercise Making You Less Fit?
Activity Disorder: Too Much/Little Of A Good Thing
From "The Eating Disorders Source Book"
WebMD
Accompanying the steady increase in the number of people with eating disorders has been a rise in the number of people with exercise disorders: people who are controlling their bodies, altering their moods, and defining themselves through their over-involvement in exercise activity, to the point where instead of choosing to participate in their activity, they have become "addicted" to it, continuing to engage in it despite adverse consequences. If dieting taken to the extreme becomes an eating disorder, exercise activity taken to the same extreme may be viewed as an activity disorder, a term used by Alayne Yates in her book Compulsive Exercise and the Eating Disorders (1991).
In our society, exercise is increasingly being sought, less for the pursuit of fitness or pleasure and more for the means to a thinner body or sense of control and accomplishment. Female exercisers are particularly vulnerable to problems arising when restriction of food intake is combined with intense physical activity. A female who loses too much weight or body fat will stop menstruating and ovulating and will become increasingly susceptible to stress fractures and osteoporosis. Yet, similar to individuals with eating disorders, those with an activity disorder are not deterred from their behaviors by medical complications and consequences.
People who continue to overexercise in spite of medical and/or other consequences feel as if they can't stop and that participating in their activity is no longer an option. These people have been referred to as obligatory or compulsive exercisers because they seem unable to "not exercise," even when injured, exhausted, and begged or threatened by others to stop. The terms pathogenic exercise and exercise addiction have been used to describe individuals who are consumed by the need for physical activity to the exclusion of everything else and to the point of damage or danger to their lives.
The term anorexia athletica has been used to describe a sub-clinical eating disorder for athletes who engage in at least one unhealthy method of weight control, including fasting, vomiting, diet pills, laxatives, or diuretics. For the rest of this chapter, the term activity disorder will be used to describe the overexercising syndrome as this term seems most appropriate for comparison with the more traditional eating disorders.
SIGNS AND SYMPTOMS OF ACTIVITY DISORDER
The signs and symptoms of activity disorder often, but not always, include those seen in anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa. Obsessive concerns about being fat, body dissatisfaction, binge eating, and a whole variety of dieting and purging behaviors are often present in activity disordered individuals. Furthermore, it is well established that obsessive exercise is a common feature seen in anorexics and bulimics; in fact, some studies have reported that as many as 75 percent use excessive exercise as a method of purging and/or reducing anxiety. Therefore, activity disorder can be found as a component of anorexia nervosa or bulimia nervosa or, although there is yet no DSM diagnosis for it, as a separate disorder altogether.
There are many individuals with the salient features of an activity disorder who do not meet the diagnostic criteria for anorexia nervosa or bulimia nervosa. The overriding feature of an activity disorder is the presence of excessive, purposeless, physical activity that goes beyond any usual training regimen and ends up being a detriment rather than an asset to the individual's health and well-being.
Monday, February 25, 2008
Recall -- U.S. Food and Drug Administration Press Release
As a trainer who regularly recommends Hot & Cold therapies to his clients to combat muscle soreness and joint pain, I wanted to alert my readers to the recall of ICY HOT HEAT THERAPY products. I have used ICY HOT and other over the counter pain relievers, and I'm sure, some of you have too... so, ''buyer beware."
FDA posts press releases and other notices of recalls and market withdrawals from the firms involved as a service to consumers, the media, and other interested parties. FDA does not endorse either the product or the company.
Chattem Issues URGENT Voluntary Nationwide Recall of Icy Hot® Heat Therapy™ Products
Contact: Chattem, Inc.
1-888-442-4464
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE -- Chattanooga, TN -- February 8, 2008 -- Chattem, Inc. announced today that it is initiating a voluntary Nationwide recall of its Icy Hot Heat Therapy products, including consumer "samples" that were included on a limited promotional basis in cartons of its 3 oz. Aspercreme® product. This recall is being conducted to the consumer level.
Chattem is recalling these products because it has received some consumer reports of first, second and third degree burns as well as skin irritation resulting from consumer use or possible misuse of these products.
All lots and all sizes of the following Icy Hot Heat Therapy products are affected by this recall:
1 Icy Hot Heat Therapy Air Activated Heat- Back
2 Icy Hot Heat Therapy Air Activated Heat- Arm, Neck, and Leg
3 Icy Hot Heat Therapy Air Activated Heat- Arm, Neck, and Leg single consumer use "samples" included on a limited promotional basis in cartons of 3 oz. Aspercreme Pain Relieving Crème.
NOTE: if products have been removed from their holding cartons the recalled products are packaged in a red colored plastic pouch which states Icy Hot Heat Therapy and either Back or Arm/Neck and Leg.
Single consumer use "samples" of Icy Hot Heat Therapy- Arm, Neck and Leg were included on a limited promotional basis in yellow and red cartons of 3 oz. Aspercreme Pain Relieving Crème. The samples were distinct and stand-alone products, clearly labeled as "Icy Hot Heat Therapy Air Activated Heat," with their own internal labeling.
These products are sold over the counter through food, drug and mass merchandisers.
Consumers who have the Icy Hot Heat Therapy products under recall should immediately stop using the products, discard them, and/or return them to Chattem, Inc.
Product may be returned for a full refund (average retail price) by calling Chattem’s Consumer Affairs Department at 1-877-742-6275 (M-F from 8am to 4pm EST) or via our website at www.Chattem.com.
Any adverse reactions experienced with the use of the Icy Hot Heat Therapy products should also be reported the FDA Adverse Event Reporting Program, either online at www.fda.gov/medwatch/report.htm, or by fax at 800-FDA-0178, and to Chattem at the above toll-free number.
Chattem is notifying its customers, including distributors and retailers, about this recall, and is arranging for immediate return of all recalled products to Chattem.
This recall only involves the above listed Icy Hot Heat Therapy products including single consumer use "samples" that were included in cartons of 3 oz. Aspercreme Pain Relieving Crème and does not involve any other Icy Hot or Aspercreme products.
Chattem is committed to the integrity and safety of its products and is undertaking this voluntary recall with the full knowledge of the Food and Drug Administration.
Consumers with questions or concerns about this product may contact Chattem’s Consumer Affairs Department at 1-888-442-4464 (M-F 8am to 4pm EST).
FDA posts press releases and other notices of recalls and market withdrawals from the firms involved as a service to consumers, the media, and other interested parties. FDA does not endorse either the product or the company.
Chattem Issues URGENT Voluntary Nationwide Recall of Icy Hot® Heat Therapy™ Products
Contact: Chattem, Inc.
1-888-442-4464
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE -- Chattanooga, TN -- February 8, 2008 -- Chattem, Inc. announced today that it is initiating a voluntary Nationwide recall of its Icy Hot Heat Therapy products, including consumer "samples" that were included on a limited promotional basis in cartons of its 3 oz. Aspercreme® product. This recall is being conducted to the consumer level.
Chattem is recalling these products because it has received some consumer reports of first, second and third degree burns as well as skin irritation resulting from consumer use or possible misuse of these products.
All lots and all sizes of the following Icy Hot Heat Therapy products are affected by this recall:
1 Icy Hot Heat Therapy Air Activated Heat- Back
2 Icy Hot Heat Therapy Air Activated Heat- Arm, Neck, and Leg
3 Icy Hot Heat Therapy Air Activated Heat- Arm, Neck, and Leg single consumer use "samples" included on a limited promotional basis in cartons of 3 oz. Aspercreme Pain Relieving Crème.
NOTE: if products have been removed from their holding cartons the recalled products are packaged in a red colored plastic pouch which states Icy Hot Heat Therapy and either Back or Arm/Neck and Leg.
Single consumer use "samples" of Icy Hot Heat Therapy- Arm, Neck and Leg were included on a limited promotional basis in yellow and red cartons of 3 oz. Aspercreme Pain Relieving Crème. The samples were distinct and stand-alone products, clearly labeled as "Icy Hot Heat Therapy Air Activated Heat," with their own internal labeling.
These products are sold over the counter through food, drug and mass merchandisers.
Consumers who have the Icy Hot Heat Therapy products under recall should immediately stop using the products, discard them, and/or return them to Chattem, Inc.
Product may be returned for a full refund (average retail price) by calling Chattem’s Consumer Affairs Department at 1-877-742-6275 (M-F from 8am to 4pm EST) or via our website at www.Chattem.com.
Any adverse reactions experienced with the use of the Icy Hot Heat Therapy products should also be reported the FDA Adverse Event Reporting Program, either online at www.fda.gov/medwatch/report.htm, or by fax at 800-FDA-0178, and to Chattem at the above toll-free number.
Chattem is notifying its customers, including distributors and retailers, about this recall, and is arranging for immediate return of all recalled products to Chattem.
This recall only involves the above listed Icy Hot Heat Therapy products including single consumer use "samples" that were included in cartons of 3 oz. Aspercreme Pain Relieving Crème and does not involve any other Icy Hot or Aspercreme products.
Chattem is committed to the integrity and safety of its products and is undertaking this voluntary recall with the full knowledge of the Food and Drug Administration.
Consumers with questions or concerns about this product may contact Chattem’s Consumer Affairs Department at 1-888-442-4464 (M-F 8am to 4pm EST).
Sunday, February 24, 2008
Moderate Fitness Also Cuts Women's Stroke Risk
A new study finds that being moderately fit can lower the risk of stroke significantly in both men and women. With as little as 30 minutes of brisk walking a day, five times a week, most people can attain this level of fitness. Fitness is "a strong predictor of stroke risk all by itself,'' says Steven Hooker, head of the University of South Carolina's Prevention Research Center who also led the study.
To read more go to: www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23291877/women and stroke risk
And to learn more about stroke prevention, visit: www.strokeassociation.org/
To read more go to: www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23291877/women and stroke risk
And to learn more about stroke prevention, visit: www.strokeassociation.org/
Thursday, February 7, 2008
Weight Training and Metabolism
By Miranda Hitti
WebMD Health News
Reviewed by Louise Chang, MD
Feb. 5, 2008 -- Weight training may be a health boon for overweight people, new research shows.
Boston University scientists report that "strength training, in addition to ... endurance training, may be of particular benefit to overweight individuals."
The researchers aren't talking about fitting into a smaller-sized pair of jeans or shrinking the numbers on the scale. Instead, they're focused on the metabolism benefits of getting stronger at any size.
Here's their key finding from lab tests on mice: Stronger muscles means more fat burned and a perkier metabolism, even with less-than-stellar diet and exercise habits.
But there's a catch. Muscles don't stay that way without work, so you've got to be in it for the long haul to keep reaping the benefits.
Yasuhiro Izumiya, MD, PhD, and colleagues used genetic engineering to turn a certain muscle gene off and on in mice.
When the gene was on, the mice got a lot more muscular and stronger, mimicking the effects of weight training.
But when the gene was switched off, the mice lost their buff physiques, as if they'd slacked off a strength-training program.
Those mice shed more fat, had livelier metabolisms, and responded better to insulin (a hormone made by their bodies to control blood sugar) when they were muscular.
That pattern held even when the mice ate fatty, sugary chow and didn't get much exercise. However, those mice did wind up fatter than active mice on a healthier diet.
The mice's metabolic benefits stemmed from their type 2 muscle fibers, which are strengthened by weight training, Izumiya's team notes in Cell Metabolism.
But strength training is just one part of fitness. In Izumiya's study, when the mice got very muscular, their grips became stronger, but they didn't fare too well on a treadmill test. So while weight training may help with weight loss, endurance training is still important.
Friday, February 1, 2008
Physically Active People May, Biologically, Be a Decade Younger
By Miranda Hitti
WebMD Health News
Reviewed by Louise Chang, MD
Jan. 29, 2008 -- Being physically active may shave 10 years off your biological age, a new study shows.
The finding "provides a powerful message" about the potential antiaging effects of regular exercise, write the researchers, who support the following CDC guidelines:
Get at least 30 minutes of moderate-intensity physical activity (such as brisk walking) at least five days per week or get at least 20 minutes of vigorous-intensity physical activity (such as jogging) at least three days a week.
The researchers -- who included Lynn Cherkas, PhD, of Kings College London -- report their findings in the Archives of Internal Medicine.
Cherkas and colleagues studied some 2,400 adult British twins who provided blood samples and completed surveys about their physical activity, smoking, and health history.
The researchers used the blood samples to measure the length of telomeres -- chromosome tips -- on the participants' white blood cells.
Telomeres shorten a bit each time a cell divides, making them a possible marker of aging.
The study shows that physically active people had longer telomeres than sedentary people, regardless of age, sex, smoking, BMI (body mass index), or socioeconomic status.
10 Years Younger?
The telomere length difference "suggests that inactive subjects may be biologically older by 10 years compared with more active subjects," the researchers write.
But the study doesn't prove that. Participants weren't followed over time, so it's not clear who lived longest.
"Persons who exercise are different from sedentary persons in many ways," writes Jack Guralnik, MD, PhD, of the National Institute on Aging, in an editorial published with the study.
The importance of telomere length is controversial and may prove valuable, but it isn't "the sought-after Holy Grail that measures in a single number exactly where any individual is in relation to eventual life span," Guralnik writes.
Telomeres aside, plenty of studies have linked physical activity to better health. For instance, physical activity was recently named one of four steps to living 14 years longer. If you're ready to become more active, check in with your doctor first. But, remember, there is no better time than the present to become more active - so, get moving....
WebMD Health News
Reviewed by Louise Chang, MD
Jan. 29, 2008 -- Being physically active may shave 10 years off your biological age, a new study shows.
The finding "provides a powerful message" about the potential antiaging effects of regular exercise, write the researchers, who support the following CDC guidelines:
Get at least 30 minutes of moderate-intensity physical activity (such as brisk walking) at least five days per week or get at least 20 minutes of vigorous-intensity physical activity (such as jogging) at least three days a week.
The researchers -- who included Lynn Cherkas, PhD, of Kings College London -- report their findings in the Archives of Internal Medicine.
Cherkas and colleagues studied some 2,400 adult British twins who provided blood samples and completed surveys about their physical activity, smoking, and health history.
The researchers used the blood samples to measure the length of telomeres -- chromosome tips -- on the participants' white blood cells.
Telomeres shorten a bit each time a cell divides, making them a possible marker of aging.
The study shows that physically active people had longer telomeres than sedentary people, regardless of age, sex, smoking, BMI (body mass index), or socioeconomic status.
10 Years Younger?
The telomere length difference "suggests that inactive subjects may be biologically older by 10 years compared with more active subjects," the researchers write.
But the study doesn't prove that. Participants weren't followed over time, so it's not clear who lived longest.
"Persons who exercise are different from sedentary persons in many ways," writes Jack Guralnik, MD, PhD, of the National Institute on Aging, in an editorial published with the study.
The importance of telomere length is controversial and may prove valuable, but it isn't "the sought-after Holy Grail that measures in a single number exactly where any individual is in relation to eventual life span," Guralnik writes.
Telomeres aside, plenty of studies have linked physical activity to better health. For instance, physical activity was recently named one of four steps to living 14 years longer. If you're ready to become more active, check in with your doctor first. But, remember, there is no better time than the present to become more active - so, get moving....
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)